UMass Amherst
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
945  Erik Engstrom SO 33:34
1,015  Michael Famiglietti JR 33:39
1,145  Dawson Bathgate SO 33:50
1,163  Jackson Southard SO 33:52
1,212  Samuel Conway SR 33:56
1,386  Michael McDonald SO 34:10
1,651  Kendall Westhoff SO 34:33
1,956  Jack Adamski SO 35:02
2,042  Christopher Polanco FR 35:13
National Rank #180 of 315
Northeast Region Rank #27 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 42.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Erik Engstrom Michael Famiglietti Dawson Bathgate Jackson Southard Samuel Conway Michael McDonald Kendall Westhoff Jack Adamski Christopher Polanco
Coast-To-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/22 1178 33:30 34:02 33:49 33:56 34:14 34:05 34:35 35:07
A10 Championship 10/28 1161 33:14 33:32 34:11 33:47 33:59 34:11 35:06 35:20 34:26
Northeast Region Championships 11/10 1155 33:43 33:20 33:14 34:09 34:02 35:22 37:05





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.4 603 0.2 0.4 0.7 2.3 4.3 6.7 8.4 9.0 10.3 10.6 9.6 9.8 7.3 7.5 5.1 3.7 2.6 1.1 0.5 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Erik Engstrom 102.5
Michael Famiglietti 109.8
Dawson Bathgate 125.4
Jackson Southard 127.9
Samuel Conway 133.3
Michael McDonald 154.1
Kendall Westhoff 183.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.2% 0.2 12
13 0.4% 0.4 13
14 0.7% 0.7 14
15 2.3% 2.3 15
16 4.3% 4.3 16
17 6.7% 6.7 17
18 8.4% 8.4 18
19 9.0% 9.0 19
20 10.3% 10.3 20
21 10.6% 10.6 21
22 9.6% 9.6 22
23 9.8% 9.8 23
24 7.3% 7.3 24
25 7.5% 7.5 25
26 5.1% 5.1 26
27 3.7% 3.7 27
28 2.6% 2.6 28
29 1.1% 1.1 29
30 0.5% 0.5 30
31 0.4% 0.4 31
32 0.1% 0.1 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0